🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion say that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.